As attorneys, we strive to determine the quality of our claims on the basis of objective information, but not on the network of assistance the elucidates that evidence. Despite tv shows that show an advocate as the primary determinant of a case, we know better than anybody else that, when a trial hits court, multiple persons employed in various capacities will make or destroy its quality, one of them being a court reporter. As all lawyers know, in the end, the outcome of most lawsuits is decided by the quality of depositions. But while lawyers scrupulously analyze depositions, they never review reporters ‘ credentials for deposition. In most cases, the judges are too distracted to question a writer in litigation as though they were questioning a witness. But there is a way for lawyers to select the best reporters without needing to prosecute them: to call a credible court reporting service. Below, we mention three facets of the screening process for reporters that identify a credible reporting agency.You may find more details about this at Kaplan, Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters.
Screening of Accredited court reporting sources is based on having the correct certifications for the work. However, anyone who has had a bad experience with a professional reporter will testify that the integrity of a newspaper relies on more than the certifications. One way to determine the credibility of a reporter outside certifications is by reviewing sources rigorously, especially those not mentioned. A reporter’s mentioned sources will be checked by every accredited court reporting service. But the strongest companies often call for multiple references not mentioned in a reporter’s resume. By reviewing a large variety of references, a news organization may assess that only a few commendable investigative tasks have been carried out by a writer or have a genuine reputation for quality.
Screening of technical skills As with most professions, technological activities, especially real-time reporting and video reporting, progressively characterize court coverage. If you want these skills in a writer, you won’t find reporters that hold them hard to identify. But you may have trouble discerning how professional a writer is in your unique news needs. Just as some lawyers take on trials they don’t practice with, some writers take on jobs that they aren’t specialized at covering. To stop such reporters, often recruit from a news service who is actively evaluating the ability of their reporters rather than assessing their abilities through their certifications.
Appearance screening Where court reporters should be tested dependent on appearance could sound odd. After all, court reporters are usually quiet throughout their duties, and sedentary. But the temperament of court reporters has more to do with how they view themselves at depositions; it also has to do with how they respond to deponents in terms of the text of deposition. A reporter who is easily bored, prejudiced or violently responds to certain topics may create a text which is inaccurate or highly flawed in terms of the nonverbal reactions of the deponent. Again, certain organizations that cover court rely on credentials from a reporter. But a news agency which respects its customers profoundly can screen its reporters based on personality.